Toyota Prius (2016) vs. Nissan Quest (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Toyota Prius and 2006 Nissan Quest specs.
2016 Toyota Prius and 2006 Nissan Quest Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2006 |
|
Model |
Toyota Prius |
Nissan Quest |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Hatch |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,700 mm |
3,150 mm |
-1 mm |
Length |
4,539 mm |
5,184 mm |
-1 mm |
Width |
1,760 mm |
1,971 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,476 mm |
1,826 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,395 kg |
1,820 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
43 L |
76 L |
-33 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,001 mm |
1,064 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,397 mm |
1,618 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,356 mm |
1,666 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,097 mm |
1,059 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
950 mm |
1,059 mm |
949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,346 mm |
1,681 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,318 mm |
1,712 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
848 mm |
1,049 mm |
847 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
955 mm |
-955 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,565 mm |
-1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,270 mm |
-1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,046 mm |
-1 mm |
Total Legroom |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
3,155 mm (over 3 rows) |
-2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
697 L |
915 L |
-218 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
24.6 |
2,483 L |
22.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,775 L |
4,211 L |
-3 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Quest
2007 |
4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve.
see full Nissan Quest review |
2005 |
4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET
see full Nissan Quest review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.