Model Year | 2020 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota RAV4 | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
Engine | 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 151 kW@6600 249 Nm@5000 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 265 kW@5600 519 Nm@4100 |
|
Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,595 mm | 5,182 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,854 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,702 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,583 kg | 2,578 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 55 L | 98 L | -43 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,003 mm | 1,087 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,212 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 991 mm | -31 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,065 L | 433 L | -432 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.6 | 1,461 L | 36.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0 L | 2,682 L | -2 L |
2020 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
I initially noted that the well-bolstered driver seat felt "ok." But after a few hours in it my rear started to feel sore. To be fair, I haven't had enough seat time in competitors to state that they fit me better. And even if they do, this could just be me. People come in many different shapes and sizes, have different postures, and so forth. Pity seat designers! The upshot: no one else can tell you how comfortable a seat will be for you. Make the test drive as long as you can before buying. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2020 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2020 | 4dr SUV 176-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Seats are comfortable but the cockpit seems designed to enfold you and while there is plenty of dose it doesn't feel roomy. The console is over large. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.