Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
Model | Toyota RAV4 | Chrysler 200 | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 269 hp@6200 246 lb-ft@4700 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 283 hp@6400 260 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,766 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,600 mm | 4,869 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,816 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,684 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,615 kg | 1,614 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 64 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 919 mm | 54 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,996 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 385 L | -37 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 13.6 | -12.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 13.6 | -11.6 L |
2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
2014 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chrysler 200.