Toyota RAV4 Toyota RAV4 2011 Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Toyota RAV4 (2011) vs. Ford Ranger (2000) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2011 Toyota RAV4 and 2000 Ford Ranger specs.

2011 Toyota RAV4 and 2000 Ford Ranger Specifications

Model Year 2011 2000  
Model Toyota RAV4 Ford Ranger  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota RAV4

2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review
2012 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review
2011 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review
2010 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic AWD
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford Ranger

2000 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual RWD
Standard cab leg room not good for anyone over 6 ft see full Ford Ranger review
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Too small for anyone over the age of ten. see full Ford Ranger review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.