| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota RAV4 and 2015 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.7 in | 106.3 in | -1.6 in |
| Length | 181.1 in | 178.7 in | 2.4 in |
| Width | 71.5 in | 72.4 in | -0.9 in |
| Height | 66.3 in | 65.7 in | 0.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3360 lb. | 3194 lb. | 166 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 1.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 40.1 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 57.5 in | -0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.8 in | 55.2 in | -1.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.0 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 39.0 in | 0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 55.5 in | -0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.4 in | 53.7 in | -1.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.3 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.2 in | 0.0 in | 37.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 52.6 in | 0.0 in | 52.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.0 in | 0.0 in | 30 in |
| Total Legroom | 110.1 in (over 3 rows) | 80.3 in (over 2 rows) | 29.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.3 ft3 | 34.1 ft3 | -21.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.2 ft3 | 34.1 | 3.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 73.0 ft3 | 64.8 ft3 | 8.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota RAV4
| 2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-5
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's no clear winner in rear seat room and comfort, either. The Mazda's rear seat is mounted a little lower than the Toyota's, and when sitting in it my knees are considerably closer (if still not close) to the front seat backs. Also, the Toyota's rear seat reclines, while the Mazda's does not. Neither car has air vents in the rear passenger compartment, but the RAV4 has a large vent high on the instrument panel apparently intended to push cool air into the rear seat via the ceiling. To counter these RAV4 advantages, the CX-5 offers about five inches more rear hip room. So three passengers will fit more comfortably. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-5
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Soon after I bought the Mazda, I did an 8 hour trip in it. I found the seat comfort to be most satisfactory. I had no trouble finding a comfortable driving position using the power seat, and, the lumbar support. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
While recently shopping for a new car for the first time in over 10 years, I found that driver's seats are now made with high sides. For me, a 5'1" female driver, this makes it a bit awkward getting in and out. Combined with the higher ground clearance of a compact SUV, it's not the ideal setup. The Mazda CX-5 is not as bad as others, but it's still an issue. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
