| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota RAV4 and 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 1,600 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 66 L | -6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 942 mm | -941 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 848 mm | 125 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 351 L | -3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 12.4 | -11.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 12.4 | -10.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota RAV4
| 2011 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
I'm about 6'3" and 220lbs so I get cramped on long trips. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
