Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Toyota Sienna | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 119.3 in | 109.3 in | 10 in |
Length | 200.0 in | 182.8 in | 17.2 in |
Width | 77.4 in | 71.1 in | 6.3 in |
Height | 68.9 in | 55.9 in | 13 in |
Curb Weight | 4177 lb. | 3373 lb. | 804 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 38.6 in | 3.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.8 in | 55.2 in | 8.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.4 in | 53.0 in | 5.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.9 in | 42.5 in | 0.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 40.2 in | 36.8 in | 3.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 64.9 in | 53.9 in | 11 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 67.5 in | 52.3 in | 15.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.6 in | 33.5 in | 6.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 38.1 in | 0.0 in | 38.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.1 in | 0.0 in | 61.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 51.8 in | 0.0 in | 51.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 39.5 in | 0.0 in | 39.5 in |
Total Legroom | 122 in (over 3 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 46 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 43.6 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 33.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 94.5 ft3 | 10.2 | 84.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 148.9 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 138.7 ft3 |
2010 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Great for hauling mom and dad, two boys, their stuff, great grandma, the dog, and more stuff! see full Toyota Sienna review |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not cramped against the dashboard to keep the kids from kicking the seats! see full Toyota Sienna review |
2010 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Sienna LE that I have has full power driver seat which proves to bereally goodfor my back pain. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.