Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Sienna | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,030 mm | 2,916 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,080 mm | 4,966 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,966 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,750 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,895 kg | 1,803 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 72 L | 4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,621 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,648 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,715 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 0 mm | 968 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,552 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,316 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,003 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,099 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,235 L | 464 L | -463 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,676 L | 16.4 | -14.4 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,216 L | 16.4 | -12.4 L |
2010 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Great for hauling mom and dad, two boys, their stuff, great grandma, the dog, and more stuff! see full Toyota Sienna review |
2011 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not cramped against the dashboard to keep the kids from kicking the seats! see full Toyota Sienna review |
2010 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Sienna LE that I have has full power driver seat which proves to bereally goodfor my back pain. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.