Toyota Sienna (2015) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Toyota Sienna and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2015 Toyota Sienna and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
Model Year |
2015 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Toyota Sienna |
Chevrolet SS |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
119.3 in |
114.8 in |
4.5 in |
Length |
200.2 in |
195.5 in |
4.7 in |
Width |
78.1 in |
74.7 in |
3.4 in |
Height |
68.9 in |
57.9 in |
11 in |
Curb Weight |
4310 lb. |
3997 lb. |
313 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
20.0 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
1.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
41.0 in |
38.7 in |
2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
65.0 in |
59.1 in |
5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
58.6 in |
57.2 in |
1.4 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
40.5 in |
42.3 in |
-1.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.7 in |
38.0 in |
1.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
64.6 in |
59.0 in |
5.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
66.1 in |
58.0 in |
8.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
37.6 in |
39.7 in |
-2.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
38.3 in |
0.0 in |
38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
61.1 in |
0.0 in |
61.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
50.3 in |
0.0 in |
50.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
36.3 in |
0.0 in |
36.3 in |
Total Legroom |
114.4 in (over 3 rows) |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
32.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
39.1 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
22.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
87.1 ft3 |
16.4 |
70.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
150.0 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
133.6 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Sienna
2015 |
The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support.
The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others.
see full Toyota Sienna review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Sienna.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.