Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Sienna | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 266 hp@6200 245 lb-ft@4700 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,030 mm | 2,946 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,080 mm | 5,182 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,966 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,750 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,995 kg | 2,578 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 98 L | -22 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,087 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,621 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,648 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,715 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 968 mm | 968 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,552 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,316 mm | 1,252 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,003 mm | 630 mm | -629 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,099 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,235 L | 433 L | -432 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,676 L | 1,461 L | 1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,216 L | 2,682 L | 2 L |
2009 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The Sienna LE that I have has full power driver seat which proves to bereally goodfor my back pain. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Room for all the kids, friends, and cargo see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
With three children having ample rear seat space was very important to us. With the tri zone air system makes it comfortable for them as well. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
plenty of space and comfortable seats see full Toyota Sienna review |
2009 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 266-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The passenger side does not have 8 way power seat controls. see full Toyota Sienna review |
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.