Model Year | 2015 | 2014 | |
Model | Toyota Sienna | Volvo S60 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 119.3 in | 109.3 in | 10 in |
Length | 200.2 in | 182.2 in | 18 in |
Width | 78.1 in | 73.4 in | 4.7 in |
Height | 68.9 in | 58.4 in | 10.5 in |
Curb Weight | 4310 lb. | 3528 lb. | 782 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 17.8 gal. | 2.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 38.3 in | 2.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.0 in | 57.0 in | 8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 58.6 in | 54.9 in | 3.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.5 in | 41.9 in | -1.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 37.4 in | 2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 64.6 in | 55.2 in | 9.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 66.1 in | 53.5 in | 12.6 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 33.5 in | 4.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 38.3 in | 0.0 in | 38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.1 in | 0.0 in | 61.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 50.3 in | 0.0 in | 50.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 114.4 in (over 3 rows) | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 39 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 39.1 ft3 | 12.0 ft3 | 27.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 87.1 ft3 | 12.0 | 75.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 150.0 ft3 | 12.0 ft3 | 138 ft3 |
2015 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Sienna.
2014 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The driver's seat and driver's position are outstanding, the best I've ever experienced and I've driven Lexuses and Infinitis. Passenger's seat is also very comfortable.rnrnCaution: Back seat and trunk are small. Also, no spare. You get an inflation kit. You can pay $250 for a donut spare. see full Volvo S60 review |
2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Volvo has a reputation for quality seating - I am very pleased with the comfort and support. I had a recent trip of about 14 hours, and the seats provided the best comfort I've had compared to all other cars I've owned and have drove in long distance trips. see full Volvo S60 review |
2014 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very tight in back. see full Volvo S60 review |
2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat space is smaller than 3-series BMW. It's fine for children/young adults, but full size people will find it a little tight. Volvo should have added about six inches to the length and a few inches in width. see full Volvo S60 review |