Model Year | 2012 | 2000 | |
Model | Toyota Tacoma | Ford Ranger | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2012 Toyota Tacoma Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Crew Cab 6ft bed 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
This review site omits offering the Tacoma Access Cab body style, which is the style of our Tacoma. Read seating is very tight for adults, making use of seat belts almost impossible. Don't plan on using Access Cab rear seats for adults unless they are of diminutive stature. see full Toyota Tacoma review |
2000 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2001 | 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Standard cab leg room not good for anyone over 6 ft see full Ford Ranger review |
2000 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Too small for anyone over the age of ten. see full Ford Ranger review |