| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Toyota Tundra and 2015 Mini Hardtop Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota Tundra | Mini Hardtop | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Tundra
| 2009 Toyota Tundra Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Lots of room for my long legs and seat is comfortable for the long haul. see full Toyota Tundra review |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
With the front seat back and back seat forward, still have knee room. The recline on the back seat is great. see full Toyota Tundra review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mini Hardtop
| 2015 Mini Hardtop Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The 4 Door has 1.5 inches more rear legroom than the regular Hardtop, but 32.3 inches still isn't much. At 5-9, I can squeeze behind myself with perhaps an inch between my knees and the carved-out front seatbacks. Rear headroom is relatively abundant even though the seat cushion is mounted a comfortable height off the floor. The rear doors, though an improvement over the Clubman's single rear-hinged half-door, are still small and don't open wide. A Ford Fiesta ST might be at least as tight in the back seat, but the GTI, with 35.6 inches of rear legroom, is far roomier and easier to get into and out of. see full Mini Hardtop review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mini Hardtop
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mini Hardtop.
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
