Volkswagen Beetle Volkswagen Beetle 2013 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Volkswagen Beetle (2013) vs. Mazda CX-3 (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Volkswagen Beetle and 2016 Mazda CX-3 specs.

2013 Volkswagen Beetle and 2016 Mazda CX-3 Specifications

Model Year 2013 2016  
Model Volkswagen Beetle Mazda CX-3  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 2dr Hatch 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 99.9 in 101.2 in -1.3 in
Length 168.4 in 168.3 in 0.1 in
Width 71.2 in 69.6 in 1.6 in
Height 58.5 in 60.7 in -2.2 in
Curb Weight 2939 lb. 2809 lb. 130 lb.
Fuel Capacity 14.5 gal. 12.7 gal. 1.8 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 39.4 in 38.4 in 1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 55.3 in 53.5 in 1.8 in
Hip Room, Row 1 0.0 in 52.3 in -52.3 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.3 in 41.7 in -0.4 in
Headroom, Row 2 37.1 in 37.2 in -0.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 49.0 in 50.4 in -1.4 in
Hip Room, Row 2 0.0 in 49.0 in -49 in
Legroom, Row 2 31.4 in 35.0 in -3.6 in
Total Legroom 72.7 in (over 2 rows) 76.7 in (over 2 rows) -4 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 15.4 ft3 12.4 ft3 3 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 29.9 ft3 44.5 ft3 -14.6 ft3

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volkswagen Beetle

2013 Volkswagen Beetle Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
2012 Back in the 1960s VW entreated Americans to "think small." Lately, though, the German manufacturers cars have been getting bigger and bigger. The latest redesign added over two inches to the car's length (now 168 inches) and over two inches to its width (now a midsize-like 71.2 inches. Compared to the 146-by-66-inch, 2,822-pound Mini and the 140-by-64-inch, 2,434-pound Fiat, the 3,340-pound Beetle TDI convertible is a big, heavy car. As noted earlier, solidity and ride quality benefit from this additional bulk. But rear seat room does not. Sure, the Beetle Convertible's rear seat is more viable than the MINI's, but bars to clear rarely come lower. The Fiat is in the same (adults-in-a-pinch) ballpark. In addition to the space shortage, the VW's rear seat back is uncomfortably upright. see full Volkswagen Beetle review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volkswagen Beetle

2013 Volkswagen Beetle Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 0 The rear seat is also surprisingly roomy. My 6'2" father was able to sit comfortably in the back for ~30 min hops around town. see full Volkswagen Beetle review
2013 Volkswagen Beetle Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.5L I5
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
The back seat, if you could really call it that, leaves a lot to be desired. Maybe another 3 in. That being said it fits a car seat with my 6' frame in the front seat ahead of it, so it gets the job done. Once the top goes down the interior space seems adequate. see full Volkswagen Beetle review
2012 2dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
I love my Beetle, but the rear seat legspace is not so good. For me its no problem at all, since normally only my wife and i drive the car, but when you normally have to drive with 4 adults, it can become crampy at the back. If the driver and front passenger are not that tall, the rear legspace is quite good. Even the headspace is ok. see full Volkswagen Beetle review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3

2016 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2016 The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review
2016 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models.