| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Volkswagen Eos and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 | |
| Model | Volkswagen Eos | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 200 hp@5100 207 lb-ft@1700 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automated manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 101.5 in | 106.2 in | -4.7 in |
| Length | 174.1 in | 179.1 in | -5 in |
| Width | 70.5 in | 72.5 in | -2 in |
| Height | 56.9 in | 65.3 in | -8.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3508 lb. | 3563 lb. | -55 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.5 gal. | 14.8 gal. | -0.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.7 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.7 in | 57.1 in | -2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.2 in | -55.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.0 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.8 in | 39.0 in | -3.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 41.5 in | 54.8 in | -13.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.3 in | -55.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.5 in | 39.6 in | -7.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 74.2 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -6.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 6.6 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -24.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.5 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -49.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Volkswagen Eos
| 2013 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models.
