Volkswagen Eos vs. Mercury Grand Marquis MPG

Chart is based on 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos and 67 fuel economy reports for the Mercury Grand Marquis.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2013	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	light	0	23	76	1	70	21.0
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	flat	light	none	0	0	50	50	65	30.0
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	light	0	15	0	85	60	31.0
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	flat	med	light	6	19	0	75	65	28.1
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	light	9	15	33	43	63	28.8
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	med	none	9	15	42	35	68	27.1
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel 6-speed automated manual FWD	flat	light	light	0	5	15	80	75	35.0
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007	2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6 6-speed automated manual FWD	hills	lead	light	3	10	10	78	78	23.8

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2010	4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	10	90	70	25.3
2009	4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	5	5	15	75	70	19.0
2005	4dr Sedan 239-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	5	5	15	75	60	23.8
2004	4dr Sedan 239-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	1	3	3	92	73	25.7
2004	4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	5	5	60	30	70	23.4
2003	4dr Sedan 239-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	0	1	12	87	75	21.8
2003	4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	15	26	19	40	68	18.5
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2002	4dr Sedan 235-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	22	23	23	31	60	22.0
2002	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	hvy	5	25	60	10	60	20.3
2000	4dr Sedan 215-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	0	0	50	50	70	21.8
2000	4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	none	1	4	40	55	61	21.9

See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles

See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models and Mercury models.

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD	I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review

Mercury Grand Marquis Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	Incredible- 21mpg city, 27mpg HWY see full Mercury Grand Marquis review

Mercury Grand Marquis Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2005	4dr Sedan 239-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD	The V-8 is thirsty for city driving. The extra power would be nice for highway & mountain driving, though. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review