Volvo C30 (2012) vs. BMW X1 (2014) Specs

vs.

◆

2012 Volvo C30 and 2014 BMW X1 Specifications

Model Year	2012	2014
Model	Volvo C30	BMW X1
Engine	turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5500 273 lb-ft@1500	turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5800 300 lb-ft@1300
Transmission	5-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	AWD
Body	2dr Hatch	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	103.9 in	108.7 in	-4.8 in
Length	167.4 in	176.5 in	-9.1 in
Width	70.2 in	70.8 in	-0.6 in
Height	57.0 in	60.8 in	-3.8 in
Curb Weight	3211 lb.	3891 lb.	-680 lb.
Fuel Capacity	15.9 gal.	16.6 gal.	-0.7 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.2 in	41.3 in	-3.1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	53.6 in	55.0 in	-1.4 in
Hip Room, Row 1	53.1 in	0.0 in	53.1 in
Legroom, Row 1	42.3 in	41.4 in	0.9 in
Headroom, Row 2	36.4 in	39.7 in	-3.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	47.0 in	54.6 in	-7.6 in
Hip Room, Row 2	41.5 in	0.0 in	41.5 in
Legroom, Row 2	33.9 in	34.9 in	-1 in
Total Legroom	76.2 in (over 2 rows)	76.3 in (over 2 rows)	-0.1 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	12.9 ft³	14.8 ft³	-1.9 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	20.2 ft³	47.7 ft³	-27.5 ft³

2012 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD	The front seats are wonderful. I tend to get stiff and sore when I sit too long in a car, especially my old VW GTI and our other VW Passat wagon. These seats in the C30 are very comfortable and I felt good getting out after a long drive. see full Volvo C30 review
2011	2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Excellent support for very long drives. Passengers in the rear say the same. see full Volvo C30 review

2012 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Lack of leg room. This car is a two seater. see full Volvo C30 review

2014 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2013	BMW makes great sport seats, with support in the right places and power-adjustable side bolsters. This said, those in the X1 Sport Line feel less cushy, and so less overtly comfortable, than I recall from other BMWs. The Evoque's front buckets lack adjustable side bolsters, but feel more luxurious. While the BMW wins on support, the Land Rover wins on comfort. Another tie. Update: when I later had an Evoque for a week its seats felt less comfortable than they had during the dealer test drive. So I'm revising this rating in favor of the BMW. see full BMW X1 review

2014 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The BMW X1's interior dimensions also closely resemble those of the previous-generation 3-Series. Up front, there's a little less space to stretch out than in the X3. But abundant headroom. About half of the X1's additional height is over one's head--you sit only a couple inches higher than in the 3-Series. This additional airspace also distinguishes the X1 from the allroad. Rear seat room could be more of an issue. As in the old 3 and the new allroad, a couple of average-sized adults will fit behind a couple more with perhaps an inch or two of clearance for their knees, while a third would be a squeeze. The seat back reclines, but the seat cushion is too low to provide good thigh support. The Evoque is similarly a less-than-ideal choice for four-plus adults taking a long trip. see full BMW X1 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 BMW X1.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks

See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.