| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Model | Volvo C30 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,639 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,252 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,783 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,457 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 40 L | 20 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 970 mm | 1,026 mm | 969 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 991 mm | -66 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,194 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,054 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 861 mm | 876 mm | -15 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 365 L | 583 L | -218 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 572 L | 1,623 L | 571 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volvo C30
| 2012 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
The front seats are wonderful. I tend to get stiff and sore when I sit too long in a car, especially my old VW GTI and our other VW Passat wagon. These seats in the C30 are very comfortable and I felt good getting out after a long drive. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Excellent support for very long drives. Passengers in the rear say the same. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2012 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lack of leg room. This car is a two seater. see full Volvo C30 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
