

Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
Model | Volvo C70 | Acura TSX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2012 Volvo C70 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Great front seats, very comfortable. Minimal wind buffeting with the top down. Volvo offered an accessory wind blocker with this model but it's not necessary. Interior trim on the arm rests could be softer. My elbow gets sore resting on the hard plastic. I keep a small fleece pad in the car to solve this little issue. see full Volvo C70 review |
2003 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I'm 6' 1" but I don't like big cars. The TSX offers adequate room and seat position for even extended trips. I've taken a few with driving 10 hours/day and cannot say I've ever had anything more comfortable. The rear seat may be cramped with my front seat position but it is seldom needed. see full Acura TSX review |
2003 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The TSX is a relatively narrow car (being a variant of the European Accord) and may not be well suited for some wider-body American drivers. see full Acura TSX review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat is small. see full Acura TSX review |