| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Volvo S60 and 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Volvo S60 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 104.8 in | 4.5 in |
| Length | 182.2 in | 171.5 in | 10.7 in |
| Width | 73.4 in | 77.4 in | -4 in |
| Height | 58.4 in | 64.4 in | -6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3548 lb. | 3680 lb. | -132 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.8 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -0.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.3 in | 40.3 in | -2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.0 in | 56.6 in | 0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.9 in | 0.0 in | 54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 43.1 in | -1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.4 in | 39.7 in | -2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.2 in | 55.4 in | -0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.5 in | 0.0 in | 53.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 35.7 in | -2.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.4 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -3.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -8.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.0 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | -39 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volvo S60
| 2012 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The driver's seat and driver's position are outstanding, the best I've ever experienced and I've driven Lexuses and Infinitis. Passenger's seat is also very comfortable.rnrnCaution: Back seat and trunk are small. Also, no spare. You get an inflation kit. You can pay $250 for a donut spare. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Volvo has a reputation for quality seating - I am very pleased with the comfort and support. I had a recent trip of about 14 hours, and the seats provided the best comfort I've had compared to all other cars I've owned and have drove in long distance trips. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very comfortable driving position. Visibility is outstanding in all quarters. I've taken this car on frequent road trips (>300 miles) and I've been very comfortable throughout the trip. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2012 Volvo S60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I5 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very tight in back. see full Volvo S60 review |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat space is smaller than 3-series BMW. It's fine for children/young adults, but full size people will find it a little tight. Volvo should have added about six inches to the length and a few inches in width. see full Volvo S60 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
