| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Volvo V50 and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Volvo V50 | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.9 in | 114.8 in | -10.9 in |
| Length | 178.0 in | 195.5 in | -17.5 in |
| Width | 69.7 in | 74.7 in | -5 in |
| Height | 58.0 in | 57.9 in | 0.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3570 lb. | 3975 lb. | -405 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -3.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 38.7 in | 0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 59.1 in | -3.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.7 in | 57.2 in | -3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 42.3 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.1 in | 38.0 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 59.0 in | -4.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 50.7 in | 58.0 in | -7.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.4 in | 39.7 in | -5.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.8 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -3.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 44.2 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 27.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volvo V50
| 2011 Volvo V50 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 113hp 1.6L I4 Diesel 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat is slightly hampered by limited head/leg/sideways room, but for normal sized persons the seat is fantastic for two with splending leg and back support. Car is also very silent, making long drives a pleasure. see full Volvo V50 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.4L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of front seat room. Good dash design accommodates tall passengers with rear facing car seat behind. Seat was vertically adjustable providing lots of hear room. see full Volvo V50 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
