Volvo V60 Volvo V60 2016 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 2017

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Volvo V60 (2016) vs. Mazda CX-3 (2017) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Volvo V60 and 2017 Mazda CX-3 specs.

2016 Volvo V60 and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications

Model Year 2016 2017  
Model Volvo V60 Mazda CX-3  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr Wagon 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 109.3 in 101.2 in 8.1 in
Length 182.5 in 168.3 in 14.2 in
Width 73.4 in 69.6 in 3.8 in
Height 58.4 in 60.7 in -2.3 in
Curb Weight 3527 lb. 2809 lb. 718 lb.
Fuel Capacity 17.8 gal. 12.7 gal. 5.1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 38.7 in 38.4 in 0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 57.0 in 53.5 in 3.5 in
Hip Room, Row 1 54.9 in 52.3 in 2.6 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.9 in 41.7 in 0.2 in
Headroom, Row 2 37.4 in 37.2 in 0.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 55.2 in 50.4 in 4.8 in
Hip Room, Row 2 53.5 in 49.0 in 4.5 in
Legroom, Row 2 33.5 in 35.0 in -1.5 in
Total Legroom 75.4 in (over 2 rows) 76.7 in (over 2 rows) -1.3 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 15.2 ft3 12.4 ft3 2.8 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 43.8 ft3 44.5 ft3 -0.7 ft3

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60

2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2015 The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive. One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not. The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward. Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary. see full Volvo V60 review
2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all. The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back. see full Volvo V60 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2016 The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review
2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.