MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Volvo XC60 vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 68 fuel economy reports for the Volvo XC60 and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Volvo XC60 L/100km

Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2016 11.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2013 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2012 12.0 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2012 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2012 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2011.5 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 73 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2011 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2011 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2011 10.7 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2010 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2010 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2010 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2010 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Volvo XC60 Volvo XC60 2010 10.5 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2016 4dr SUV turbocharged 325hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 0 15 15 70 70 11.5  
2013 4dr SUV turbocharged 212hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 0 25 25 50 80 8.7  
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 13 21 12 54 108 12.0  
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 212hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 10 10 40 40 80 8.8  
2012 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 40 30 30 60 11.8  
2011.5 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med light 0 0 27 73 67 11.3  
2011 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 9 19 22 51 68 11.4  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011 4dr SUV turbocharged 202hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 5 0 80 15 60 8.7  
2011 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 38 30 33 68 10.7  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 281hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 10 14 17 60 67 11.3  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 202hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed manual AWD		 flat med hvy 0 10 20 70 90 8.1  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 173hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 30 30 10 30 80 7.1  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 173hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed manual AWD		 hills v.lt none 0 0 30 70 60 7.1  
2010 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 3.2L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 20 20 60 60 10.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volvo XC60 fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos L/100km

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 7.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 7.6 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 8.2 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 6.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 9.9 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 11.2  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 7.9  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 7.6  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 8.4  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 8.2  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 8.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 6.7  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 9.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Volvo XC60 vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Volvo XC60 and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models and Volkswagen models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Volvo XC60

Volvo XC60 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Volvo has a new, highly fuel efficient four-cylinder engine on the way. For 2014, though, the XC60 continues to be powered by a trio of 3.0-liter sixes that lag most competitors in fuel economy. The T6 scored 17 mpg in the EPA's city cycle, and 24 mpg on the highway. The Cadillac SRX does even worse (16/23), but the Acura RDX (19/27), Audi Q5 3.0T (18/26), BMW X3 35xDrive (19/26), and Mercedes-Benz GLK350 (19/24) all do better. These disappointing test scores were validated during my week with the car. In suburban driving the trip computer average usually ranged between 18 and 20. Even with a light foot 22 wasn't easy to achieve. see full Volvo XC60 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volvo XC60

Volvo XC60 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 325hp 3.0L I6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Not that great for a cross-over SUV, but it's a relatively heavy, solid vehicle with a 6-cylinder turbo, so it's not exactly a hybrid! see full Volvo XC60 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review