| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Model | Volvo XC60 | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,774 mm | 2,578 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,628 mm | 4,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,890 mm | 1,791 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,712 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,820 kg | 1,591 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 55 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 965 mm | 988 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,377 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 909 mm | 59 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,367 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 826 mm | 99 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,885 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 872 L | 187 L | 685 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,909 L | 297 L | -296 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volvo XC60
| 2012 Volvo XC60 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 300hp 3.0L I6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
They are firm enough & well shaped to be comfortable over the long trip + also comfortable when you first sit in them see full Volvo XC60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Volkswagen Eos
| 2012 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
