| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Volvo XC90 and 2011 Volkswagen Eos Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2011 | |
| Model | Volvo XC90 | Volkswagen Eos | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hardtop conv. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 112.6 in | 101.5 in | 11.1 in |
| Length | 188.9 in | 173.5 in | 15.4 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 70.5 in | 4.2 in |
| Height | 70.2 in | 56.8 in | 13.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4330 lb. | 3505 lb. | 825 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.1 gal. | 14.5 gal. | 6.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 37.5 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 54.7 in | 3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 0.0 in | 55.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 41.7 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 35.8 in | 2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.4 in | 41.5 in | 15.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 0.0 in | 54.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 32.5 in | 2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.5 in | 0.0 in | 35.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.1 in | 0.0 in | 30.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 105.7 in (over 3 rows) | 74.2 in (over 2 rows) | 31.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.8 ft3 | 6.6 ft3 | 2.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 43.3 ft3 | 6.6 | 36.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 85.1 ft3 | 10.5 ft3 | 74.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Volvo XC90
| 2006 Volvo XC90 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 311-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
7 passenger capacity. see full Volvo XC90 review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 268hp 2.9L I6 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front leather seating is very comfortable. Having the heated front seats in twe winter allows for quick comfort. The multi adjustable seating for both driver and passenger allows for each to set seats to their liking then set in the memory location see full Volvo XC90 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Volkswagen Eos
| 2011 Volkswagen Eos Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
The back seat is not comfortable and has limited leg room. While the latter may be typical of some convertibles, leg room is less than on previous convertibles I have owned. see full Volkswagen Eos review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
