| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own "whys" and "why nots."
Cadillac CTS Fuel Economy Pros and Cons
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
| Page 1 of 1 | ||
5 comments
|
2016 Audi A6 2.0T Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Among non-hybrid gasoline-powered upscale midsize sedans, the front-wheel-drive A6 2.0T has the highest EPA ratings: 24 mpg city, 35 mpg highway. (The BMW 528i scores one mpg lower in both tests.) Opt for "quattro" all-wheel drive, as in the tested car, and the ratings fall to 22/32. Still very good... Comparison vehicle: 2016 Cadillac CTS |
4 comments
|
2014 Lexus GS 350 F Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Last time around I listed fuel economy among the reasons not to buy a Lexus GS 350. But the RWD car, with less weight and two more gears in its box, is more efficient on the highway, with an EPA rating up 3 mpg to a competitive 29. (The EPA... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Cadillac CTS |
4 comments
|
2015 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh To achieve the stiff body structure behind the impressive safety scores and ride quality, Hyundai added substantial reinforcements, including a brace at every corner of the engine compartment. These plus the relatively large dimensions mean that the new Genesis is substantially heavier than the old one. Equipped with the V8,... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Cadillac CTS |
|
2014 Cadillac CTS Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6... Comparison vehicle: 2012 BMW 5-Series |
|
2011 Cadillac CTS-V wagon Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Even more than with the typical car, the harder you push the CTS-V the more it drinks. I often observed fuel economy in the single digits. In fairly casual suburban driving the trip computer reported between 12 and 16 miles-per-gallon. Only with a very light foot can the CTS-V be... Comparison vehicle: 2008 BMW 3-Series |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
|
2009 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in North Carolina, United States 14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. |
|
2006 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member4373 |
|
2004 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member3010 Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. |
|
2006 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States |
|
2005 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member2222 |
|
| |
|
2005 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member1614 I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member1308 |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States 23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States Averaging 25.5 on the highway. |
|
2003 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Illinois, United States The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. |
|
2003 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member1221 I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member2097 |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member2096 fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap |
|
2008 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons Member1639 City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. |
|
2003 Cadillac CTS Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
