Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2014 Kia Cadenza Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The EPA estimates that the Cadenza will manage 19 mpg in city driving and 28 mpg on the highway. The Impala rates a bit lower (18/28), while the Azera rates a bit higher (20/29). The Avalon does better than the others, though: 21/31. The Cadenza's trip computer reported averages close... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Chevrolet Impala |
|
I just love the car, this is my 2ND one. 2012 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member5382 I got 468 miles on a tank of gas from Greenville TN to Charleston SC then to Myrtle Beach. Very impressed |
|
Grey gohst 2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member5724 15 in town. 30 highway |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member3273 Less then 25 MPG average |
|
2011 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member5109 So far so good with E10 Fuel I am getting an average of 27 and I only have 500 miles on it so far. I now have over 3000 miles and just got back from a long trip 1/2 of it hilly. I set the cruise on 67 and let... |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member741 Mileage averages 23-24 around town and close to 30 on road trips which is quite good considering engine size and power. |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Minnesota, United States Only get about 25 mpg on interstate with the 3.9 Active fuel management is a gimmick in my opinion and older GM cars with a V6 I have driven have been better with fuel economy than the 3.9. |
|
2009 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member4221 Averaging 25.0 mpg in mixed driving, very good for the size of the vehicle and the the fact that it is a V6. |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member2935 Great with the 3.5LV6. I get about 23-25 City and 36-38 Hwy. |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member2867 |
|
2003 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada For such a large car, the fuel economy is amazing. Like most vehicles, if you drive it hard the economy is poor. However, if you can drive sensibly on the highway at about 105 kph or 65 mph it will easily get over 30 mpg (38 mpg Canadian)! |
|
| |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Virginia, United States it matches smaller hondas |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member2293 Regular gas 28 city 33 Highway. E-85 25 city 28 highway. |
|
2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States 25 cty & 30 hwy what more could you ask for in a car the will go 145mph and 14 second 1/4 mile times. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member2428 Fuel Economy beats smaller sized cars, let alone others in the same class. 30mpg is not hard to attain. |
|
1 comment |
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons A member in North Dakota, United States In town mileage is less than 15 mpg. |
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons A member in Maryland, United States Its a full size car that gives good performance and still gets 30 MPG on the highway. |
|
2002 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Maryland, United States |
|
2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States 20 mpg in the city is acceptable for a larger car. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member2185 If driven carefully, 22-30 MPG around town and 33-36 MPG highway. If you are a sloppy driver, make that 18-20 and 25 MPG. |
|
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States |