Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2014 Kia Cadenza Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The Impala has an inch or two more rear legroom than the Cadenza, but this difference is much like that between a pool that is 12 feet deep and one that is 15. All of these sedans have more rear legroom than all but the tallest passengers will need. Comparison vehicle: 2014 Chevrolet Impala |
|
2005 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member5292 Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member741 When the drivers seat is all the way back there is little rear seat legroom for tall folks. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member3273 Not enough leg room. |
|
2007 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member2867 |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Pros and Cons Member2707 Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member2428 Large trunk space seems to sacrifise rear seat area. |
|
2008 Chevrolet Impala Pros and Cons Member2185 Perhaps the largest rear seat in a sedan. Can squeeze three normal adults. |