Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
If on a budget and want: comfort, decent performance, styling and safety look absolutely no further. 2002 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member6217 Is really decent, for what it is. I could swear it gets better than what fueleconomy.gov says. |
|
2012 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member5537 Average mpg from trip computer is 30.1! Can't complain. Mostly driven as a commuter car on relatively flat 2 lane roads at 55 mph. |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Montana, United States For a sport-sedan, this car gets great mileage. 50/50 driving is an average 20.5 mpg for me. 90/10 driving is 24 mpg for me. I pick up speed quick and then light foot my way down the road. Average temperature is 32F which can impact my mpgs. |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member4378 |
|
2002 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member4118 |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member2335 For AWD, 300 HP, I can still get 24 mpg. |
|
2006 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada |
|
2003 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member1311 Good fuel economy from the 5cyl. |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons A member in Ontario, Canada 7/100kms - excellent for a car this size |
|
2004 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons Member838 Surprisingly good fuel economy for a pretty powerful engine. 28+ on highway. |