We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chrysler 300 vs. Ford Ranger MPG

Chart is based on 203 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler 300 and 141 fuel economy reports for the Ford Ranger.

Chrysler 300 MPG

Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2014 26.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2013 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2012 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2012 19.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2011 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2009 22.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2008 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2008 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2008 14.4 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2007 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2007 17.8 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2007 23.3 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2006 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2006 18.3 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2006 17.6 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2006 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2006 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2005 16.6 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2005 23.7 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2004 17.9 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2004 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2003 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Chrysler 300 Chrysler 300 2001 18.0 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan 363-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light hvy 0 0 20 80 70 26.3  
2013 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
8-speed automatic RWD
flat lead hvy 3 10 25 63 75 21.3  
2012 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 5 10 75 10 70 21.3  
2012 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
8-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 5 5 10 80 100 19.6  
2011 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 3 13 37 47 77 26.7  
2009 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 10 10 30 50 70 22.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 350-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 2 3 5 90 70 25.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills med light 20 10 55 15 58 16.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 8 80 2 10 106 14.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 425-horsepower 6.1L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat v.lt light 0 20 20 60 90 22.1  
2007 4dr Sedan 350-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 5 75 0 20 65 17.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 3 10 17 70 113 23.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 425-horsepower 6.1L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat lead hvy 32 27 25 18 60 17.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 32 19 42 83 18.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 8 13 43 38 73 17.6  
2006 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 10 5 5 80 120 22.6  
2006 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 0 25 25 50 65 17.1  
2005 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 4 28 35 34 66 16.6  
2005 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 9 22 10 58 90 23.7  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 20 23 23 34 85 17.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 0 0 0 100 65 27.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med hvy 5 8 25 63 68 23.5  
2001 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 0 70 10 20 75 18.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler 300 fuel economy data.

Ford Ranger MPG

Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2021 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2020 24.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2011 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 13.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 26.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 16.0 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 14.4 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 17.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 19.4 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 17.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 15.6 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 18.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 21.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 18.3 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 19.3 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 14.6 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2001 18.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2021 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 20 0 80 100 20.5  
2020 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 40 50 0 0 24.5  
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 27 13 60 68 20.4  
2010 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 10 10 10 70 100 20.4  
2010 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 9 36 0 55 75 27.0  
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med hvy 8 48 10 35 120 13.0  
2009 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 20 0 80 65 26.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 50 0 45 100 16.0  
2008 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 10 10 70 65 19.0  
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 53 0 47 107 14.4  
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 53 47 65 17.2  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 16 20 54 100 19.4  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 25 35 25 15 110 12.5  
2006 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 20 10 35 35 75 17.4  
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 50 20 30 60 16.7  
2005 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light light 5 20 35 40 60 30.0  
2005 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 10 60 10 20 75 15.6  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 20 70 55 20.0  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills light light 0 0 5 95 65 18.0  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 0 20 10 70 75 21.1  
2004 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 10 30 40 20 60 27.1  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med hvy 1 5 10 84 70 18.3  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 9 38 20 34 69 17.0  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 5 10 5 80 60 21.3  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med none 0 3 3 95 70 19.3  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 25 65 65 22.6  
2003 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 8 8 21 64 65 24.8  
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 0 90 10 70 14.6  
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 0 18 0 82 74 16.7  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat v.lt none 10 10 10 70 60 22.0  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 135-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 48 35 18 75 25.5  
2001 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light hvy 0 0 30 70 60 18.5  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 20 80 100 16.3  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 100 0 0 0 0 11.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Ranger fuel economy data.

Chrysler 300 vs. Ford Ranger MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chrysler 300 and Ford Ranger's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Wagons.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chrysler 300

Chrysler 300 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
I average 31Mpg highway, 'nuff said. see full Chrysler 300 review
2012 4dr Sedan 470-horsepower 6.4L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
This car has a 6.4-Liter V8 engine which produces more horsepower and torque than you'd ever need for any passing situation or any driving situation. That is, unless your las t name is "Andretti". The first of the 2nd gen 300 models I drove was the 390HP V8 in the AWD model, followed by the Pentastar V6. see full Chrysler 300 review
2011 4dr Sedan 292-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
I am light footed when it comes to driving and this car with the 3.6 will return very favourable fuel economy when treated as such. This car had 500 km when I purchased it and now has 1800 km and highway mileage is consistently at 7.3 L/100Km. see full Chrysler 300 review
2005 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
The MDS allows decent fuel economy for the super-quick acceleration and fun to drive factor of a large 8 cylinder engine. see full Chrysler 300 review
2001 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
For a car going on 13 years it still gets 23 mpg highway and 18 city. see full Chrysler 300 review
Chrysler 300 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Average 23mpg overall. Temperatures under 30 degrees and the AWD is always on and got 19mpg on the highway. Not bad for a 4400lb car, not good if you pay for gas. see full Chrysler 300 review
2008 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
I am not impressed with the fuel economy that my car gets. It only gets 22-24 mpg. The sticker states 26-28. I get that it is a bigger, heavier car, but they need to be more honest and realistic about the mpg. see full Chrysler 300 review
2008 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
I get about 20-25% worse fuel economy than EPA specified in the city, although on the highway I do 5-10% better, despite my occasional lack of regard for the posted speed limit. see full Chrysler 300 review
2008 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.7L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Way lower than what I had expected see full Chrysler 300 review
2007 4dr Sedan 350-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Like any high performance vehicle, too much use of the throttle is--EXPENSIVE! see full Chrysler 300 review
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic AWD
From a social conscious view the 19 MPG AVG is poor, especially with gas costing $4 a gal. But face it, considering the performance you get... I can live with the guilt and high cost of driving. see full Chrysler 300 review
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Expected fuel economy to be closer to 17 mpg in city driving. see full Chrysler 300 review
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Are you kidding me? Its a HEMI. see full Chrysler 300 review
2006 4dr Sedan 340-horsepower 5.7L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
city averaging 12-13. highway only averaging 20-21 see full Chrysler 300 review
2005 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
18 mpg city and 31 mpg highway in Canadian gallons. U.S. would be 0.8 of the value. see full Chrysler 300 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. see full Ford Ranger review
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck with a V8 and more features and by this time I'm sure that I could have broken even if you consider how much the Ranger has cost me in additional fuel costs. Although I'm confident that this little Ranger will last for years, I'm afraid that I will be trading it earlier than I would have wanted to find something that is not such a gas guzzler. see full Ford Ranger review
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 see full Ford Ranger review
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel see full Ford Ranger review
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 see full Ford Ranger review
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual RWD
V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review