Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
Model | Hyundai Genesis | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 118.5 in | 107.1 in | 11.4 in |
Length | 196.5 in | 188.1 in | 8.4 in |
Width | 74.4 in | 73.9 in | 0.5 in |
Height | 58.3 in | 55.6 in | 2.7 in |
Curb Weight | 4138 lb. | 3401 lb. | 737 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.3 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 4.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 38.5 in | 2.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 55.3 in | 3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.7 in | 53.4 in | 2.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 45.7 in | 42.4 in | 3.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.2 in | 34.7 in | 3.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.1 in | 51.6 in | 5.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.8 in | 46.8 in | 8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 35.0 in | 29.8 in | 5.2 in |
Total Legroom | 80.7 in (over 2 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 8.5 in |
Cargo Volume | 15.3 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 1.9 ft3 |
2015 Hyundai Genesis Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Unlike in the past, the Cadillac CTS is smaller and lighter than its direct competitors. Instead, the strategy of fielding a larger, heavier car has passed to Hyundai. The new Genesis is about the same length as the old one, and is only an inch longer than the Cadillac (196.5 vs. 195.5 inches). But it rides on a considerably longer wheelbase (118.5 vs. 114.6 inches) and is also significantly wider (74.4 vs. 72.2 inches). These more generous dimensions pay off in about three more inches of rear legroom and over two more inches of rear shoulder room. Based on interior measurements, the Genesis is actually a large sedan, not a midsize. Still, all is not golden in the back seat of the Genesis. Its cushion is mounted a little too low to provide sufficient thigh support (typical in this segment), and its backrest felt like it was reclined a bit too much. see full Hyundai Genesis review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Hyundai Genesis.
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |