We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Lexus NX vs. Mazda CX-7 MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Lexus NX and 98 fuel economy reports for the Mazda CX-7.

Lexus NX MPG

Lexus NX Lexus NX 2017 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2017 4dr SUV turbocharged 235hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 80 26.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Lexus NX fuel economy data.

Mazda CX-7 MPG

Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2011 15.5 MPG Highway Percentage 13 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2011 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2010 19.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2010 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2009 22.8 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2009 17.3 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2008 19.8 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2008 16.6 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2007 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Mazda CX-7 Mazda CX-7 2007 18.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2011 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light none 10 43 33 13 110 15.5  
2011 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med none 0 15 35 50 75 23.5  
2010 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light light 0 3 48 50 83 19.3  
2010 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 3 5 48 45 78 27.1  
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 5 7 43 45 65 22.8  
2009 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 5 50 8 38 110 17.3  
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light none 8 15 46 31 82 19.8  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 22 21 36 21 85 16.6  
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 12 24 23 42 68 20.5  
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 13 17 27 43 67 18.5  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mazda CX-7 fuel economy data.

Lexus NX vs. Mazda CX-7 MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Lexus NX and Mazda CX-7's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models and Mazda models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Lexus NX

Lexus NX Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2015 Even upscale manufacturers have been shifting from V6 engines to turbocharged fours for one big reason: the imperative to improve fuel economy. The Lincoln MKC's EcoBoost four isn't long on eco. With front-wheel drive (FWD), the 240-horsepower 2.0T engine scores 20 and 29 mpg in the EPA's city and highway tests, respectively. But these figures drop to 19/26 with all-wheel drive (AWD) and 18/26 with a 285-horsepower 2.3T engine option. The Audi Q5 2.0T, with standard AWD, does a bit better: 20/28. The 235-horsepower Lexus NX 200t does a bit better still, at least in city driving: 22/28 with FWD and 21/28 with AWD. In my real-world suburban driving I could nudge the trip computer-reported average as high as 33 mpg. The upper 20s were easy to achieve. The trip computer averages in the MKC were typically about three mpg lower--even though the tested crossover did not have AWD. The original Lexus RX 300, with a 220-horsepower 3.0-liter V6, wasn't nearly as efficient: 19/24 with FWD and 19/22 with AWD. One reason: its automatic had only four ratios. The NX's, like the Lincoln's has six. (The Audi's has eight.) If fuel economy is a top priority, then Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz offer diesels. The Mercedes-Benz GLK250, with EPA ratings of 24/33, much more easily topped 30 mpg in my suburban driving, and averaged 40 mpg on one run home from my son's school. The BMW X3 xdrive28d tested even better, 27/34. To counter these diesels, Lexus also offers the NX in 300h form, the "h" for hybrid. I haven't driven the NX 300h, but the EPA rates it 35/31 with FWD and 33/30 with AWD. see full Lexus NX review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Lexus NX

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Lexus NX.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda CX-7

Mazda CX-7 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Traded in an F-150. CX-7 is not great but much better than a pick-up. Avg 22-28 mpg. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
reasonable see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
bad fuel economy, I guess thats why 2006-2008 models do have a trip computer but the trip computer was not able. 2009 to present all have same trip computer that provides MPG,distance to empty and somewhat of an improved gas mileage. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Plenty of performance when needed yet 23 mpg on highway see full Mazda CX-7 review
Mazda CX-7 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Again adequate but could be better. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Low compared to other crossovers, due to turbo. HOwever, actual results have been higher than expected - 22/highway. (owner 8 months) see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Gas milage could be better. 19/22. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
With european fuel prices you can drain your wallet refuelling this car. However when you compare with other having 260 HP it is still not so bad see full Mazda CX-7 review
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
My Toyota Rav4 fuel economy was much better. Sometimes I have regrets getting 16MPG see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
The consumption is a bit to high but if you want power you must make some compromises. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Fuel economy not as good as many competitors in this class, combined with premium fuel requirements. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
It is smaller yet gets the same gas mileage as the much larger and heavier Q7. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Averaged 15 MPG in the city. I would have expected closer to 20 MPG out of this vehicle. see full Mazda CX-7 review
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Premium fuel, gas mileage not as good for a smaller engine. see full Mazda CX-7 review