

Nissan Rogue Brand Reputation: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Nissan is known for quality, although at times overpriced vehicles. see full Nissan Rogue review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
good reputation for quality see full Nissan Rogue review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Nissan really made a difference in current product offerings see full Nissan Rogue review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
I trust Nissan for reliability and I love the looks of my new Rogue. see full Nissan Rogue review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Had good previous experiance. see full Nissan Rogue review |
Mercury Milan Brand Reputation: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Persistent rumors that Ford will drop the line; Sable has already been dropped. The Milan Premier, although touted by Mercury as an upscale car, is nothing more than a re-badged Fusion and not as comfortable as my 2000 Taurus. see full Mercury Milan review |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Ford is not known for beating the Japanese in reliability. But at the time I bought this the Milan was rated more trouble free than Camry by consumer reports. I have only added gas and oil. It runs the same at 54K as 18K. see full Mercury Milan review |