| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Acura MDX and 2015 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 109.3 in | -1 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 182.8 in | 8.8 in |
| Width | 78.5 in | 71.1 in | 7.4 in |
| Height | 68.2 in | 55.9 in | 12.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 4550 lb. | 3373 lb. | 1177 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 38.6 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.6 in | 55.2 in | 6.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 53.0 in | 6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 42.5 in | -1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 36.8 in | 1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.5 in | 53.9 in | 7.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 59.1 in | 52.3 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 33.5 in | 5.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.5 in | 0.0 in | 37.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.0 in | 0.0 in | 42 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.1 in | 0.0 in | 29.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 109 in (over 3 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 33 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 4.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.9 ft3 | 10.2 | 32.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.5 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 73.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS
| 2015 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
