| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Acura MDX and 2009 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2009 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,867 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,994 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,732 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,064 kg | 1,530 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 61 L | 18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 980 mm | 16 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,565 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 881 mm | 99 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,562 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 770 mm | 213 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 953 mm | 0 mm | 953 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,450 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,067 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 739 mm | 0 mm | 739 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 371 L | 54 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,215 L | 13.1 | -12.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,364 L | 13.1 | -11.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Acura MDX
| 2011 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Mustang
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
