| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Acura MDX and 2016 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.3 in | 99.6 in | 8.7 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 160.0 in | 31.6 in |
| Width | 78.5 in | 67.0 in | 11.5 in |
| Height | 68.2 in | 60.0 in | 8.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 4550 lb. | 2513 lb. | 2037 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 10.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.2 in | 39.5 in | -0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.6 in | 54.8 in | 6.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 51.5 in | 7.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 41.4 in | -0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 37.5 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.5 in | 52.6 in | 8.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 59.1 in | 45.1 in | 14 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 39.3 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.5 in | 0.0 in | 37.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.0 in | 0.0 in | 42 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.1 in | 0.0 in | 29.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 109 in (over 3 rows) | 80.7 in (over 2 rows) | 28.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 16.6 ft3 | -1.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.9 ft3 | 16.6 | 26.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.5 ft3 | 52.7 ft3 | 30.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
| 2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
