| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Audi A3 and 2016 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Audi A3 | Toyota Sienna | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 147 kW@5100 281 Nm@1800 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 198 kW@6200 332 Nm@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automated manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,578 mm | 3,030 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,285 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,765 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,422 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,578 kg | 2,082 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L | 76 L | -19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 968 mm | 1,041 mm | 967 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,379 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,488 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 1,008 mm | 936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,341 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,679 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 955 mm | -71 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 371 L | 1,107 L | 370 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.1 | 2,466 L | 11.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,546 L | 4,248 L | -3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Audi A3
| 2010 Audi A3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
A lot less leg room when compared to the GTI, but the rear hatch space is bigger. see full Audi A3 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
| 2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
