| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Audi TT and 2016 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Audi TT | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,469 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,178 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,359 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,430 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 74 L | -12 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 958 mm | 1,019 mm | 957 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,501 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 828 mm | 1,021 mm | 827 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,207 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,455 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 742 mm | 975 mm | -233 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,786 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 371 L | 467 L | -96 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.1 | 1,325 L | 12.1 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 699 L | 2,376 L | 697 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Audi TT
| 2013 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD |
Never had a two seater with this much room for a 6 footer plus. Total comfort all around see full Audi TT review |
| 2013 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD |
I like the looks, but there is a downside. As a geezer, getting in and out of the car is not easy. You sit down low, and it has these little gangster windows. see full Audi TT review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
| 2016 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
