| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 BMW X3 and 2015 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
| Model | BMW X3 | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 110.1 in | 114.8 in | -4.7 in |
| Length | 179.7 in | 195.5 in | -15.8 in |
| Width | 73.0 in | 74.7 in | -1.7 in |
| Height | 66.0 in | 57.9 in | 8.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 4012 lb. | 3975 lb. | 37 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.7 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -1.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.1 in | 38.7 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.8 in | 59.1 in | -3.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 57.2 in | -57.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.2 in | 42.3 in | -2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 38.0 in | -0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 59.0 in | -3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 58.0 in | -58 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.8 in | 39.7 in | -3.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 30.0 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 13.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 71.0 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 54.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 BMW X3
| 2007 BMW X3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6 6-speed manual AWD |
With the comfort seat option, you can customize seat position to you preference, including lumbar and shoulder adjustment. Decent support for someone up to 6 feet tall. Heated seats work very well. see full BMW X3 review |
| 2007 BMW X3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.0L I6 6-speed manual AWD |
A little cramped and very stiff seats. see full BMW X3 review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 225-horsepower 3.0L I6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats are underpadded and undercontoured see full BMW X3 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
