BMW X5 (2013) vs. Nissan Rogue (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 BMW X5 and 2015 Nissan Rogue specs.
2013 BMW X5 and 2015 Nissan Rogue Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2015 |
|
Model |
BMW X5 |
Nissan Rogue |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
115.5 in |
106.5 in |
9 in |
Length |
191.2 in |
182.3 in |
8.9 in |
Width |
76.1 in |
72.4 in |
3.7 in |
Height |
69.9 in |
66.3 in |
3.6 in |
Curb Weight |
4960 lb. |
3393 lb. |
1567 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
22.5 gal. |
14.5 gal. |
8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
39.3 in |
41.6 in |
-2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
60.0 in |
56.6 in |
3.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
0.0 in |
54.0 in |
-54 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
40.0 in |
43.0 in |
-3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.0 in |
38.5 in |
0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
58.0 in |
55.9 in |
2.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
0.0 in |
52.1 in |
-52.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
36.6 in |
37.9 in |
-1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
34.6 in |
-34.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
49.3 in |
-49.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
42.0 in |
-42 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
0.0 in |
31.4 in |
-31.4 in |
Total Legroom |
76.6 in (over 2 rows) |
112.3 in (over 3 rows) |
-35.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
7.1 ft3 |
9.4 ft3 |
-2.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
21.9 ft3 |
32.0 ft3 |
-10.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
61.8 ft3 |
70.0 ft3 |
-8.2 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
2014 |
BMW's multicontour seats, a $1,300 option on six-cylinder X5s and standard with the V8, deliver a rarely matched combination of support in turns and comfort on long drives. In a reversal of traditional tendencies, the buckets in the Range Rover Sport feel firmer and less comfortable.
Though you'll find a commanding view forward in either driver seat, the Range Rover Sport maintains an edge in this area. Unusually large windows are one thing that makes a Land Rover a Land Rover.
see full BMW X5 review |
2013 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Audi and Mercedes both offer much longer SUVs. At least until BMW fields an X7, the X5 is available with an optional third-row seat. Especially considering the size and price of the X5, said third row is absurdly tight, thinly upholstered, and difficult to access. The door openings are small, and the entire second row seat pivots forward and upward off the floor in an only partially successful attempt to compensate. To provide even minimal legroom for those using it, the second row must slide forward a few inches, to the point that its occupants find their own legroom severely compromised. Both rows are too low to the floor for adult comfort.
The third-row seat optional in the Range Rover Sport probably isn't much better, and deletes the spare tire (not available on the BMW regardless). This might explain why it wasn't on the tested vehicle. If you want a usable third row, Land Rover offers the less stylish, but also much less expensive and roomier LR4.
Shift focus to the second-row seat, and I found that in the smaller X3 at least as comfortable, and easier to get into and out of thanks to the more compact vehicle's lower ride height. That in the Range Rover Sport, though also not the roomiest or the most comfortable, is better than the X5's.
see full BMW X5 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X5.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Nissan Rogue
2014 |
Both the Rogue and the Forester have roomy rear seats mounted higher off the floor than most, and thus better suited for adult comfort and non-adult outward visibility. But only the Nissan has air vents back there.
The Rogue is also one of the only members of the segment to offer a third-row seat, the others being the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Kia Sorento (which in width and price actually falls between compact and midsize). Unlike in the others, though, you cannot get a third-row seat with the Rogue's top trim level. So you must choose between the third-row seat on the one hand and the SL's additional features (heated leather seats, Bose audio system, forward collision alert, LED headlights) on the other. You also cannot get the third-row seat with the panoramic sunroof.
The tested vehicle was the SL, so no third-row seat. Judging from the specs, it should be roomier than that in the Outlander, and about a match for that in the Sorento. Adults might fit in a pinch, but it's probably best to think of the seat as kids-only.
Combine this third-row seat availability with the Rogue's EPA ratings, and you have the most fuel-efficient vehicle that can seat seven (but not on leather).
see full Nissan Rogue review |
2015 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The Rogue SL's leather-trimmed seats appear luxurious, but like those in some other recent Nissans (with the notable exception of the Altima) feel flat and overly firm. The power seat adjustments include height, but not tilt. Mazda has also started deleting the driver seat tilt adjustment, and both automakers deserve to be taken to task for this. Those with upright builds (including me) will find that the Rogue's front seat headrests jut too far forward. The Forester's front seats are more comfortable.
see full Nissan Rogue review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Nissan Rogue
2014 |
4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
In previous car, I had problems with leg pain after 2.5 hours. No such problem after multi-hour drives now. Still need an insert for back support.
see full Nissan Rogue review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
BMW models.