Model Year | 2016 | 2023 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Acura MDX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,891 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,039 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,999 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,704 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,937 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 978 mm | 2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,572 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,506 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 968 mm | -33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 978 mm | -127 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 919 mm | -919 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,400 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,031 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 737 mm | -737 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 462 L | -173 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,107 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,022 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Acura MDX.