Model Year | 2014 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 272 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@1700 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 112.5 in | -3.2 in |
Length | 182.8 in | 185.3 in | -2.5 in |
Width | 71.1 in | 72.8 in | -1.7 in |
Height | 55.9 in | 66.3 in | -10.4 in |
Curb Weight | 3542 lb. | 4188 lb. | -646 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -2.8 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 39.8 in | -1.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 55.7 in | -0.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 55.1 in | -2.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.2 in | 1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.2 in | -2.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 55.3 in | -1.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 51.3 in | 1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 39.9 in | -6.4 in |
Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | -5.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.2 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -21.4 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | -53.7 ft3 |
2014 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The latest 3-Series has a roomy, comfortable back seat. Cadillac didn't see this coming, and sized the ATS to compete with the previous-generation BMW. Consequently, the Cadillac's rear seat is considerably tighter than the BMW's or the Infiniti G37's, a little tighter than an A4's, about even with that in a C-Class, and roomier than that in a Lexus IS. If you want adults to be comfortable in back, the ATS isn't your car, but neither are most of the cars it competes with. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Cadillac ATS.
2015 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |