Model Year | 2010 | 2022 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 4,788 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,584 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 59 L | 9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 955 mm | 31 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 884 mm | 61 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 737 mm | 175 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,821 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 385 L | 382 L | 3 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Ford Mustang.