Cadillac CTS vs. Mazda MX-5 Miata MPG

Chart is based on 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS and 287 fuel economy reports for the Mazda MX-5 Miata.

Cadillac CTS MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2016	4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	0	0	60	40	70	22.1
2011	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	hvy	23	40	13	23	83	18.0
2010	4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	light	light	0	5	2	93	60	23.0
2010	4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	v.lt	none	0	64	3	34	70	18.2
2010	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	0	100	70	25.5
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	lead	light	10	8	39	44	62	15.3
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	light	5	5	35	55	65	13.2
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	med	hvy	11	16	21	53	71	22.6
2009	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	light	3	18	42	37	57	19.8
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	32	34	24	72	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	flat	med	none	4	23	42	31	70	19.7
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	light	8	25	15	53	75	22.5
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	1	6	19	74	70	23.4
2008	4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	hills	med	light	0	0	83	17	70	19.3
2007	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	light	4	9	9	78	71	20.3
2007	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	mtns	lead	light	0	0	70	30	60	19.5
2006	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	hvy	15	50	0	35	70	18.4
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	light	25	10	5	60	85	21.0
2006	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	11	11	72	80	21.3
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	light	none	5	20	50	25	100	16.8
2006	4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	light	7	20	50	23	67	19.2
2005	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	7	13	24	57	69	20.7
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	2	15	35	48	60	20.2
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	8	12	33	47	69	23.9
2004	4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	0	0	30	70	67	21.2
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	none	7	25	24	45	66	21.9
2004	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	10	10	0	80	70	25.6
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	flat	med	light	10	17	33	40	91	22.9

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Mazda MX-5 Miata MPG

Year	Body/Powertrain	flat, hilly, or mountainousLand	driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot	A/C use: none to heavyA/C	constant stop and goTraf %	many stops per mileCity %	stop every mile or twoSub %	fairly steady speedHwy %	Hwy Spd	MPG
2017	2dr Convertible 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	25	25	0	50	70	31.1
2016	2dr Convertible 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	none	15	30	15	40	80	34.5
2016	2dr Convertible 129-horsepower 1.5L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	v.lt	none	5	5	20	70	65	40.8
2013	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD	hills	med	light	5	5	46	44	60	35.6
2012	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	1	10	39	49	70	28.7
2011	2dr Convertible 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	0	40	0	60	70	31.0
2010	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	15	16	19	51	68	28.3
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010	2dr Convertible 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	med	none	2	2	13	85	63	30.7
2009	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	11	20	34	36	70	26.9
2009	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	none	0	8	20	73	73	31.5
2008	2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	5	15	34	46	67	27.6
2008	2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	none	0	10	10	80	63	27.2
2008	2dr Convertible 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	hills	med	light	17	8	13	63	75	30.7
2007	2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	15	28	5	51	80	27.9
2007	2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD	hills	v.lt	light	0	15	15	70	50	26.0
2007	2dr Convertible 163-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	med	hvy	2	14	37	47	67	30.4
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	1	3	45	51	96	26.9
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	light	7	67	13	13	93	27.7
2006	2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	flat	light	none	0	0	30	70	70	27.8
2005	2dr Convertible turbocharged 178hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	none	13	23	29	35	67	27.5
2005	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	0	0	16	84	76	31.2
2004	2dr Convertible turbocharged 178hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	4	26	24	45	65	25.9
2004	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	lead	none	0	0	20	80	60	27.0
2004	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	3	10	7	80	110	18.8
2003	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	hills	med	none	3	10	18	70	83	31.9
2003	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	7	26	25	42	70	28.0
2002	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	8	20	30	43	74	23.6
2002	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	23	13	5	60	68	28.5
2002	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic RWD	flat	light	light	10	20	50	20	60	21.5
2001	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	hills	lead	light	3	60	13	25	55	27.9
2001	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	light	14	22	45	20	68	25.5
2001	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic RWD	hills	med	none	0	0	29	71	58	31.2
2000	2dr Convertible 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	flat	med	none	0	20	10	70	80	27.0

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mazda MX-5 Miata fuel economy data.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, and Coupes.

See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models and Mazda models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003	4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008	4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004	4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda MX-5 Miata

Mazda MX-5 Miata Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	Nothing has improved more with the Mazda MX-5 Miata's latest redesign than its fuel economy. The 2015 managed only 21 mpg city and 28 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, disappointing for such a light car powered by a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter engine. The new car tests much better: 27/34 with a manual transmission and 27/36 with an automatic. The MINI Cooper S Roadster was about equally efficient when equipped with a manual transmission (26/35), a little short with an automatic (25/34). The new MINI Convertible, if it shares the Hardtop's EPA ratings, won't be as efficient with a manual transmission (23/33) but will be as competitive as its predecessor with an automatic (26/33). The Scion FR-S barely out-economizes the old Miata with a manual (22/30) but is just a couple mpg short of the new one with an automatic (25/34). Premium fuel is recommended in all of these cars. The new Miata can use regular unleaded at the cost of some responsiveness. In my real-world driving of the new Miata with an automatic transmission the trip computer reported a suburban average around 30 mpg. On a 60-mph highway the average can reach 40, about 4 mpg better than a Scion FR-S and 5 mpg better than a MINI JCW Clubman, both tested with manual transmissions. Drive at 75 mph with the top down, though, and the reported average will fall to 34 mpg. The largest fuel economy advantage over the Scion FR-S appeared when both were flogged along Ohio's Route 26. The Scion's fuel economy dipped into the high teens, but the Mazda's only into the mid-20s. The most likely reason: the torquier, far less peaky Mazda engine doesn't have to be revved nearly as high to reach its sweet spot. The JCW Clubman, its turbo reducing the need for fuel-guzzling runs to the red line, fell between the two with a "spirited driving" average around 20 mpg. Overall, with the redesign the Miata's fuel economy has gone from worst to first. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review

Mazda MX-5 Miata Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Comment
	The first four "why nots" shouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone. This one might. I didn't ding the MX-5 Miata's engine for its power output, but I am going to ding it for its fuel input. While EPA ratings of 21 mpg city and 28 mpg are hardly abysmal, the FR-S does better (22/30) and a 315-horsepower Porsche Boxster S does about as well (20/28). With one of Mazda's new SKYACTIV engines, the Miata would go much farther on a gallon of gas. (The 2,900-pound Mazda3 is rated 27/39.) But this engine won't happen until the Miata is again redesigned. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda MX-5 Miata

Mazda MX-5 Miata Real Gas Mileage: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	Good enough to drive for fun and not worry about the cost. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2008	2dr Convertible 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD	I average 28mpg city and about 32 highway, and I have an uncontrollable lead foot in this car. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	The MX-5 always seemed to be great on gas, no matter how hard you flogged it, top up or top down. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	I average about 8.5 L/100 km, so even though it uses Premium fue, it only costs about $40 to drive as much as 475km. This is with gas at about $1.20 a litre. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	a very cheap car to run see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	To date gas millage has never gone under 30mph and has gone to almost 39mph. And this has not been driving it EASY. Like I said before, it is a FUN FUN FUN Car. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2006	2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD	Great fuel economy for a sporty car. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2005	2dr Convertible turbocharged 178hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	Excellent mileage. I get 36mpg on normal highway cruises and about 28mpg in town. When I go to the race track, I run around 22-24 mpg. If you are really savvy, this car burns about 2 gallons an hour! So cheap to keep on the road. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2003	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	Never thirstier than 10.5 l/100 km, even during autocross. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review
2003	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD	30-35 MPG....easy question these days. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review

Mazda MX-5 Miata Real Gas Mileage: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2003	2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD	For a small (size of a subcompact) 4-cylinder stick shift, it only gets around 28 mpg highway...my 6-cylinder Honda Accord got 30+. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review