| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Cobalt | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.3 in | 107.1 in | -3.8 in |
| Length | 180.3 in | 188.3 in | -8 in |
| Width | 67.9 in | 75.4 in | -7.5 in |
| Height | 55.7 in | 54.4 in | 1.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2730 lb. | 3526 lb. | -796 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 37.6 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 56.3 in | -3.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 49.5 in | 54.9 in | -5.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.0 in | 42.0 in | 0 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 34.8 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 49.0 in | 52.2 in | -3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.1 in | 47.4 in | -1.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.2 in | 30.6 in | 1.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 74.2 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 1.6 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.9 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 0.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt
| 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
4 door has more headroom and backseat is much improved over the 2 door i previously owned see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
With only 2 doors, the rear seats are pretty much useless. Obviously, if you really have to, you can fit people back there, but no one will want to climb back there when everyone at work is going out to lunch. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Not alot of head room and the steering wheel does not telescope. I fit in it fine but someone tall might not. minor thing really. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.2L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Hard and thin seat cushions. Legs would feel fatigue after a couple hours of driving. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
