Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Chevrolet Cobalt | Honda Pilot | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,624 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,585 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,725 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,450 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,261 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 49 L | 74 L | -25 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,019 mm | 977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,257 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 958 mm | 1,021 mm | 957 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,306 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,260 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 856 mm | 975 mm | -119 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,918 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 394 L | 467 L | -73 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.9 | 1,325 L | 12.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.9 | 2,376 L | 11.9 |
2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
4 door has more headroom and backseat is much improved over the 2 door i previously owned see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
With only 2 doors, the rear seats are pretty much useless. Obviously, if you really have to, you can fit people back there, but no one will want to climb back there when everyone at work is going out to lunch. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
2009 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Not alot of head room and the steering wheel does not telescope. I fit in it fine but someone tall might not. minor thing really. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.