| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Spark and 2003 Mazda B-Series Truck Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Mazda B-Series Truck | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda B-Series Truck
| 2003 Mazda B-Series Truck Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 147-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
I am 6'5", and my head hits the roof. As a result, I have to recline my seat to keep my head off the roof. see full Mazda B-Series Truck review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
