Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
Model | Chevrolet Spark | Mazda Mazda6 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
2003 Mazda Mazda6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I don't find it a very comfortable car for trips over about an hour. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not big enough across for three small children. Less legroom than my 1994 Honda Accord, which was about the same size overall. see full Mazda Mazda6 review |