| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Spark and 2003 Mazda MPV Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Spark | Mazda MPV | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda MPV
| 2003 Mazda MPV Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Minivan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Plenty of room see full Mazda MPV review |
| 2002 | 4dr Minivan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Room to seat six comfortably, seven in a pinch. see full Mazda MPV review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
