| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet Traverse and 2009 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Traverse | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,020 mm | 2,720 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,174 mm | 4,765 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,994 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,775 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,107 kg | 1,530 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 61 L | 22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,562 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 881 mm | -880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,549 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 770 mm | 165 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 960 mm | 0 mm | 960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,227 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 843 mm | 0 mm | 843 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,827 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 691 L | 371 L | 320 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,991 L | 13.1 | -12.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,293 L | 13.1 | -10.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Traverse
| 2016 Chevrolet Traverse Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2016 | 4dr SUV 281-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I bought this vehicle to be able to transport my grandchildren back and forth between New Jersey and Ohio. I have the 2LT version with four captains chairs and really enjoy the convienence of not having to move a middle row seat to allow one of them to get into the "way back". Having three kids jammed together in a middle seat for an 8 hour drive is courting disaster--that's why I needed that third seat. Everyone has plenty of space. Normally I find any drive over 4 hours a bit uncomfortable but the seat and driver's position was very relaxing and comfortable. This particular vehicle has the most room for storage behind the third seat than any in its class. It is only beat by minivans and they just aren't my kind of vehicle. see full Chevrolet Traverse review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Mustang
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
